An erotic time with an attractive older woman
| |  | Kissing
|
| | | Oral sex without a condom |
| | | Penetrative sex |
I'd first seen Marilyn in the flesh a week before and had promised my self I'd return and explore this new ground! So I went along on a Sunday when it is usually quite quiet and got her booked without any hassle. She was waiting when I arrived, so on this occasion I didn't have the usual sit down and chat with the receptionist, Chris, who'd already provided me with a glass of water, but went direct to the room.
Appearance-wise, Marilyn is, in my opinion, almost 100% not the person in the photos on Classic's website, unless they were taken very many moons ago, and even then I'd doubt it. However, that said, she looks and dresses very sexy indeed, has a great figure, cute little bottom, and large boobs. She was bare-legged on a hot day, but I am sure that her long and very shapely legs would look absolutely stunning in fully fashioned stockings. Overall, she must have been stunning 20-30 yrs ago!
Into action, with standing deep French kissing before laying on the bed, then into nice uncovered oral. Next she straddled me for more deep French kissing, then more oral, condom on for cowgirl and quite a protracted energetic missionary to finish, during which she gave every appearance of having cum herself, but who knows. Throughout the session Marilyn was quite erotic in her manner, taking the lead in kissing etc, and is a nice companion. I was out of the room after 25 minutes out of the usual 30 min slot, and paid her the £45. I could well return for a re-match.
Just as a footnote, I'd suggest that Classic take some new photos of Marilyn, because she's attractive enough to bring in customers in her own right as a mature woman, without resorting to misleading photos.
Anonymous
The entire content of this report is for entertainment purposes only
and can be considered as a complete work of fiction which depicts the activities
of one or more fictional characters. Any reference to real persons, dead or alive
is purely coincidental.
|
