Mechanical session - maybe she was having a bad day
| | Happy Ending |
I was feeling the need and gave Tara a call, she wasn't busy and I was there in 15 minutes The area is very safe, parking is free outside and the entry is directly off street which can be a bit daunting.
Upon entry I was greeeted by Tara who was in her usual tunic and leggings. She asked if I wanted to use the facilites which I did. I don't think there is a shower but I have never asked.
The room is fairly small but very comfortable with a large massage table. It is always lovely and warm. Tara left me to undress and I got on the bed naked and face down.
Tara returned and I asked for a sensual soft massage. Tara started to work on my legs which was lovely but there were no CC swipes or ball play, which was disappointing. Furher work on my back and a very nice head massage followed before Tara asked me to turn over. More work followed on my legs and inner thighs and I was getting aroused, but still no ball or cock play.
Eventually Tara masssged my tummy and then asked if "he" would like to be massaged. I said "yes" and what followed was what could best be described as a very fast and furious hand job, which was not one of the best I have had. All done and dusted, a quick wipe and clean up and I was left to get dressed.
I have read an earlier report on here that Tara did body-to-body and some anal play but I seriously doubt the accuracy of that report.
Finally dressed, I paid Tara my £60 in the main reception area, a quick cuddle and I left, feeling very underwhelmed. Has Tara gone off the boil? It was all a bit mechanical, maybe she was having a bad day. I'm going to give this place one more go to give Tara the benefit of the doubt as she is a lovely lady but if things don't improve then I won't be going back.
Anonymous
The entire content of this report is for entertainment purposes only
and can be considered as a complete work of fiction which depicts the activities
of one or more fictional characters. Any reference to real persons, dead or alive
is purely coincidental.
|